Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

Of course I disagreed and still do.
It's clear that you haven't yet realized that sometimes I prefer letting you talk to yourself, rather than waste my time

I posted the evidence and there is a lot of evidence on the net that supports what I said.

If you disagree with fact, then perhaps you should stop posting because you would appear foolish otherwise.

There is no zone on the planet that the EU outperforms other than perhaps level peg with Latin and Central America if they lucky. Everyone else is kicking EU Arse!

Yeah, right, cherry picking is easy. Once taking the values that suit you for the EU as a whole, the other time taking the values of the Eurozone etc etc. You don't even know that the growth of GDP DOES NOT qualify as the overall performance of an economy. An already developed economy is always destined to have less GDP growth than a developing country however which of the 2 economies performs better?
This explains your fallacy that the EU is the worst performing economy.
In any case you said what you had to say, I said what I had to say, going round in circles is meaningless.
Probably we are both wrong,or both partially right,or only one of us is right. It doesn't matter.
That's the whole point of discussions Paphitis,learning and challenging.
Now I let you once again have the final word, because I know you are dying for it as always.

Every single source you look at has the EU either last or just ahead of Latin and Central Anerica by a mere 0.1%.

You do your own search and find out for yourself. I have not cherry picked at all. It's common knowledge that the EU and the Eurozone is last, behind Asia, North America, South America, Australasia, Middle East and behind Africa. Look it up and find out yourself.

https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/econo ... -by-region

https://www.worldbank.org/en/publicatio ... -prospects

https://www.cnbcafrica.com/news/special ... ng-region/

[Paphitis]

Why does anyone take this moron even a tiny bit seriously ? Haven't you yet realized that he is an utter idiot ? The fact that he ....knows so much about the UK, a country he has only visited perhaps once or twice or Cyprus that again has only visited perhaps again once or twice ?
Just look at the crap he posted on the Syrian thread, imagining himself as the coalition's commander in chief. He hates Russia, he refers to Putin as Pootin, he hates intensely in fact as much as he hates the ..." criminal" EU. Just as the other arsehole, Fuckrage, he made sure he and his family have EU passports.

Because he has a strong and in many aspects valid opinion Milti and I don't see the reason why we should ignore him.
I personally breathed UK's air for a couple of hours waiting in Heathrow for a transit flight.
Does this mean I should not have an opinion?

Yes you can have an opinion but you most certainly would not claim that you know the English better than someone who lived amongst them for more than half a century.
This moron has made him self an expert not only on the UK but on the whole of Europe , he calls the EU " criminals" does this strike you as man with valid opinions ?
He strikes me as a complete idiot, a pretentious arsehole !!

I live in Australia.

It's pretty much as British as you can get. Australia and Britain are closely connected and have been closely connected since the beginning of time.

We share the same Head of State, the same Governance, and we even share a Union Jack.

And let me tell you something about Aussies and Brits. They are no fucking idiots when it comes to their sovereignty and Nationalism. I was born in Australia, YOU ARE A BLOW IN FOREIGNER! I served my country which means I also served Her Majesty so piss off bozo!

Our soldiers died alongside their's. Thousands upon thousands of them creating river streams of blood. We sometimes didn't see eye to eye and preferred the Yanks. Go and see the nationalism of a Yank. They will pull out their guns and shove them up your arse if you talk to them with such defeatist shit and go all one world government on them.

Our flags and nationhood means something bozo! We don't want to be under Brussels, or anyone else apart from London and Canberra respectively.

[Paphitis]

[Paphitis]

This one is actually FAKE NEWS.

These 2 guys are Russian sponsored Pootin lover bois!

This is straight from the St Petersburgh Troll Factory and they are Cypriot.

These 2 guys are on the Russian payroll.

[miltiades]

I'm aware of the close ties between Australia and the UK. Are you aware that the EU has 27 member states, it excludes the UK. When you are calling the EU "criminal",you are also calling all member nations criminal. The EU must have uniformity and a " Head Office" Brussels does not dictate to the rest of EU members
It sets out uniform directives on a variety of areas. It also provides for its citizens a protection of their human rights, its citizens can travel to any of the 27 countries freely as well as reside in one of the 27 countries.
It has preserved the peace for more than 60 years, it has provided grants to most of its member states to modernise their roads, helped the farming world , and gave European citizens above all security in knowing that what they eat must conform to EU regulations. I'm and always have been a stern supporter of unity in Europe, do not wish my grandchildren to become victims of a European 3rd world war.
You appear rather unbalanced in so many fields due to the fact that you lack confidence and you are a very naive individual.
You demonstrated this over the years with your warped views on so many issues not least your thread titled "I HATE POOTIN MORE THAN ISIS"

[Paphitis]

This guy provides good commentary.

He is a Brexiteer yes, but he also tells it the way it is and tries very hard to be accurate and factual whether its good or bad for the BREXIT case.

He has given me great insight. He tries hard this one.

[Lordo]

here is what bbc does. they claim that court in scotland has thrown the case out, when in fact they decided that the government assured them they wil lbe sending th eletter on the 19th of october and so they felt there is nothong to do till 19th when the law is broken.

and they inrpret this as a victory to brexshitters. like hell it is. b'stard has cought his nuts in the tractors tracks more likely.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-49959167

[Paphitis]

I'm aware of the close ties between Australia and the UK. Are you aware that the EU has 27 member states, it excludes the UK. When you are calling the EU "criminal",you are also calling all member nations criminal. The EU must have uniformity and a " Head Office" Brussels does not dictate to the rest of EU members
It sets out uniform directives on a variety of areas. It also provides for its citizens a protection of their human rights, its citizens can travel to any of the 27 countries freely as well as reside in one of the 27 countries.
It has preserved the peace for more than 60 years, it has provided grants to most of its member states to modernise their roads, helped the farming world , and gave European citizens above all security in knowing that what they eat must conform to EU regulations. I'm and always have been a stern supporter of unity in Europe, do not wish my grandchildren to become victims of a European 3rd world war.
You appear rather unbalanced in so many fields due to the fact that you lack confidence and you are a very naive individual.
You demonstrated this over the years with your warped views on so many issues not least your thread titled "I HATE POOTIN MORE THAN ISIS"

No I am not. I am no calling Greece or Cyprus criminal.

They are victims. I am calling the faceless gravy trainers who pass laws and ridicule nations, stifle democracy and who are unelected as being criminals.

It's a big huge gravy train which will be going down.

Sorry but I am not buying that we need EU to provide Human Rights. How dare you say that when they are trying to trample on democracy?

I say it how it is. I don't overly hate the EU, but I don't like them. No way are they anywhere near as bad as Pootin.

I have my views and you have yours.

I will support any country leaving the EU. I am in full support of BREXIT because I am 100% a DEMOCRAT and believe in Human Rights and the sovereign vote of 17.4 million voters who voted to leave. If it went the other way, I would have accepted it.

[Paphitis]

here is what bbc does. they claim that court in scotland has thrown the case out, when in fact they decided that the government assured them they wil lbe sending th eletter on the 19th of october and so they felt there is nothong to do till 19th when the law is broken.

and they inrpret this as a victory to brexshitters. like hell it is. b'stard has cought his nuts in the tractors tracks more likely.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-49959167

I would call that a victory to BORIS.

All BORIS needs to do is abide by the law and I think they got something up their sleeve. What that is is unknown. But I think Boris is cooking up a number.

The Mother Country is leaving. Get ready folks for independence Day.

[erolz66]

Fake news is already being propagated my the MSM.

Is the Telegraph news paper in the UK part of the MSM ? The Daily Mail ? Fox News ? This entire narrative that there is a singular thing that is the MSM, owned and controlled by an elite left wing cabal, that put out fake news to fool and control and manipulate the 'people', who are so stupid they fall for it, is just a fairy tale when presented in such simplistic and binary ways.

People need to obtain good information from other sources in order to establish what's what.

You mean like your Jeff Taylor videos that you are so fond of ? Seems to me your idea of a 'good information' is anything that supports your pre held view and nothing else. If a MSM outlet has something that supports your view, then it is a good source of information. If it does not then its fake news from the corrupt MSM. If a partisan nobody like Jeff Taylor post stuff that supports your views then it is a 'good source' but if it is a non mainstream outlet that does not support your views then it is dismissed by you. See the correlation here ? What makes something, in your view, a good source is nothing to do with the size or ownership or control or partisan nature of the source. It is just down to does it agree with you, then it is a 'good source', if it does then it is a 'bad source, corrupt source, partisan source etc etc etc.

The videos I post contain great content and good information and some of the information is cutting edge stuff.

QED.