The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Abhorrent ? - poll

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

the question is in post one of the thread


Note: Your vote in this poll is NOT confidential. Your username will be displayed under the option(s) you select

yes
6
100%
 
erolz66, Lordo, miltiades, Pyrpolizer, RichardB, Sotos
no
0
No votes
 
 
Total votes : 6

Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby erolz66 » Fri Nov 08, 2019 5:41 pm

Do you find it abhorrent when someone characterises a teacher that has been convicted in a court of law of child sex abuse including sexual penetration as "probably an extremely distinguished person who served the school with utter and complete professionalism and diligence." ?

in referance to cyprus47149-100.html#p889762

The poll is NOT anonymous.
erolz66
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 8:31 pm

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Paphitis » Fri Nov 08, 2019 5:47 pm

What total nonsense.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25192
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby cyprusgrump » Fri Nov 08, 2019 6:53 pm

Oh do fuck off erolz... :roll:
User avatar
cyprusgrump
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7444
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Pissouri, Cyprus

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Pyrpolizer » Fri Nov 08, 2019 6:57 pm

There have been so many polls against poor Paphitis that I sometimes feel sorry for him.
However sorry Paphitis, but without even having the courage to admit you were wrong, to someone who really suffered himself, there can be no sympathy for you.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 10452
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Paphitis » Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:03 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:There have been so many polls against poor Paphitis that I sometimes feel sorry for him.
However sorry Paphitis, but without even having the courage to admit you were wrong, to someone who really suffered himself, there can be no sympathy for you.


Suffered what. Do you actually believe he suffered.

C'mon Pyro. I personally am surprised as to how gullible you are.

This man is just your typical Marxist Corbynov supporter ho is throwing his weight around in support of Corbynov's class warfare against establishment schools and the private schooling sector at large. Not all private schools are as high end as Eton.

It's envy politics and he doesn't give a stuff about any of the students that will fall victims to this labor policy because I can tell you it will NOT be the rich. The rich will always afford to pay any fees but the rest of us probably won't be able to pay the fees and that will eventually exclude thousands of middle and working class families from providing the best opportunities they can afford for their children.

So no, he doesn't give a stuff, He just wants to taike us all down because it is us he will take down and not the Murdochs which he doesn't like because they are rich and powerful.

Envy politics Pyro!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25192
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Pyrpolizer » Fri Nov 08, 2019 7:20 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:There have been so many polls against poor Paphitis that I sometimes feel sorry for him.
However sorry Paphitis, but without even having the courage to admit you were wrong, to someone who really suffered himself, there can be no sympathy for you.


Suffered what. Do you actually believe he suffered.

C'mon Pyro. I personally am surprised as to how gullible you are.

This man is just your typical Marxist Corbynov supporter ho is throwing his weight around in support of Corbynov's class warfare against establishment schools and the private schooling sector at large. Not all private schools are as high end as Eton.

It's envy politics and he doesn't give a stuff about any of the students that will fall victims to this labor policy because I can tell you it will NOT be the rich. The rich will always afford to pay any fees but the rest of us probably won't be able to pay the fees and that will eventually exclude thousands of middle and working class families from providing the best opportunities they can afford for their children.

So no, he doesn't give a stuff, He just wants to taike us all down because it is us he will take down and not the Murdochs which he doesn't like because they are rich and powerful.

Envy politics Pyro!


You are stepping WAY TOO LOW Paphitis... Come back to your senses please.
I started feeling embarrassed just talking to you. :oops:
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 10452
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Lordo » Fri Nov 08, 2019 8:01 pm

there is an issue with bafidi. they has no brains no brains. it is beyond belief that anybody would see this as political thing.

there is a lot of sick swine around and seem to find themselves in places where they can do this and seem to have cover from higher authorities.

https://www.itv.com/news/channel/2019-07-18/50-increase-in-sexual-crimes-against-children-in-guernsey/
Last edited by Lordo on Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 13850
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Sotos » Fri Nov 08, 2019 8:58 pm

Erolz, the info given in this thread is too little (and I am not going to waste my time trying to find the relevant posts in the other thread!).

Somebody could be "convicted in a court of law of child sex abuse" and could also be "an extremely distinguished person who served the school with utter and complete professionalism and diligence." It depends. When they say "child" what do they mean in this case? A small child, or a teenager just below the age of consent in a country where this age is set too high? If the second, then was it an actual rape, or merely a "statutory rape", and was the teenager a student of this teacher, or somebody unrelated to the school of the teacher?

I remember reading in the news some months ago about some 30 something teacher in the US who had sex with a 16 year old student of hers. I doubt this particular one was "extremely distinguished" and clearly not professional, since she had sex with her own student, but she was quite good looking and if I was 16 I would happily fuck her as well and I am sure I would really enjoy it without having any "psychological trauma". For me there is no crime whatsoever in such cases, let alone a "major" one, where that poor woman would have to be in jail for I don't know how many years for the "crime" of giving pleasure and orgasms to somebody who is clearly old enough for sex and who was doing this voluntarily for his own enjoyment.
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11288
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby Lordo » Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:14 pm

Sotos wrote:Erolz, the info given in this thread is too little (and I am not going to waste my time trying to find the relevant posts in the other thread!).

Somebody could be "convicted in a court of law of child sex abuse" and could also be "an extremely distinguished person who served the school with utter and complete professionalism and diligence." It depends. When they say "child" what do they mean in this case? A small child, or a teenager just below the age of consent in a country where this age is set too high? If the second, then was it an actual rape, or merely a "statutory rape", and was the teenager a student of this teacher, or somebody unrelated to the school of the teacher?

I remember reading in the news some months ago about some 30 something teacher in the US who had sex with a 16 year old student of hers. I doubt this particular one was "extremely distinguished" and clearly not professional, since she had sex with her own student, but she was quite good looking and if I was 16 I would happily fuck her as well and I am sure I would really enjoy it without having any "psychological trauma". For me there is no crime whatsoever in such cases, let alone a "major" one, where that poor woman would have to be in jail for I don't know how many years for the "crime" of giving pleasure and orgasms to somebody who is clearly old enough for sex and who was doing this voluntarily for his own enjoyment.

yet another brainless swine. how can the two exist together. if a person is convicted of child abuse, no matter what esle they did is shit. only a gc could think like you. likr the swine who killed innocent civilians in murataga and was employed to distinguish himself as a religous teacher.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 13850
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: Abhorrent ? - poll

Postby B25 » Fri Nov 08, 2019 9:25 pm

Guys give it up, it is only ok when Muslims can fuck 9 year olds and its 'ok'. Anyone else and its a crime.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6439
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Next

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests