The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


La La Land

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:35 pm

User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Sun Jun 19, 2022 8:52 pm

I guess not many people realise why Farmer BoZo and the Head Swinehunt were trying to send 7 innocent refugees to Rwanda. The answer will be obvious just after the by-elections.

In the meantime clearly some pibol here did not understand that the reason it was not allowed was because it was against the human rights of the refugees.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:21 pm

Returning back to the subject matter. Now clearly Brexit was a good thing and current situation has nothing to do with brexit or at least so famer BoZo informs us. And then we read this news and you realise BoZo has been puling the middle one with bells on it. British Airways employing illegal workers who have no right to work in the land.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/news/airlines-use-post-brexit-loophole-to-bring-in-foreign-workers/ar-AAYDHtg?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=3532fcf7ed194229bc8d41844c1b687f
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:06 pm

User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Get Real! » Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:04 pm

A correction:

Last week I mentioned the ECHR interfering in the Rwanda debacle and hence the EU despite Brexit, but I’ve since learned I was wrong because the ECHR is not part of the EU but an independent institution to which Britain is a signatory.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48300
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:31 pm

Get Real! wrote:A correction:

Last week I mentioned the ECHR interfering in the Rwanda debacle and hence the EU despite Brexit, but I’ve since learned I was wrong because the ECHR is not part of the EU but an independent institution to which Britain is a signatory.

That's no big deal, not even the Attorney General realised that. She could not understand why ECHR had a say here. She also did not realise that it was only challenged in court because the policy was not passed through parliament, it was an executive decision made by Bodjer.

Clearly it is the ECJ that has no more say here except Northern Ireland of course, there ECJ does have say. And it is this they would like to remove with the new law they are trying to pass through and of course in Northern Ireland, they will come up against ECJ as well as the Northern Ireland Assembly which currently has a majority for the Protocol and the numbers will not change to alter the situation.

So I guess what Bodjer is trying to do is save his own skin by trying to look as though he is trying to deliver Brexit, but he forgets he told people the Brexit he negotiated was oven ready. Like fuck it was. We have 3 days to go when two Tory seats are up for grabs and the polls say he will lose both. One to Labour and the other to Liberals.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Londonrake » Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:56 pm

Get Real! wrote:A correction:

Last week I mentioned the ECHR interfering in the Rwanda debacle and hence the EU despite Brexit, but I’ve since learned I was wrong because the ECHR is not part of the EU but an independent institution to which Britain is a signatory.


Yes. IIRC the ECHR was a post WW2 construct, mainly of the satanical British. Through that great devil himself, Churchill. The idea being to hopefully put a future block on the sort of fanatical ideology which had just brought about the destruction of most of Europe. That was its responsibility.

Since the 1990s though it has seemed to me that the judiciary have taken upon itself a sort of governmental role. Using it's supposed responsibility of "interpreting" the law they have in essence been actual creators. We saw this in the run up to the 2019 UK election where numerous judgments were made on the initiation of individuals (Gina Millar being one) brought about to overturn the democratically expressed decision of millions of the electorate that the UK should withdraw from membership of the EU.

Many of those proudly proclaiming the decision of the ECHR (one member of whom is actually a Russian :lol: ) wrt the recent Rwanda debacle were apoplectic about it's ruling regarding the Labour Party's antisemitism.

When did we ever allow hypocrisy to interfere with our "debates" in here though? :lol:
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4554
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Tue Jun 21, 2022 12:36 am

You can sing the praises of the old man all you like. Fact is he was responsbile for starving to death 3 million Indians innocent civilians including children back in 1943. You think for some reason any good he does actually cancels what else he did? I fear not.

And yet Bodjer and his gang is complaining why ECHR is involved. Clearly they are as thick as shit when it comes to International law.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Tue Jun 21, 2022 9:48 pm

What else is there to say?

Oh ok. Workers are waking up.


Railworkers.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: La La Land

Postby Maximus » Tue Jun 21, 2022 10:02 pm

Pway Pete should apply to become;

A chief executive, well being officer, chief of staff, director general, chief of security, diversity chief, chairman, HR director, planning regulator, property director, or the chief information officer.

Instead, he risks his life everyday shoveling grovel on the rail lines hoping that his big red stop sign will stop oncoming freight trains.

Dont be Pway Pete.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7240
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests