Londonrake wrote:Lordo wrote:And yet Bodjer and his gang is complaining why ECHR is involved. Clearly they are as thick as shit when it comes to International law.
Just like you, when the ECHR pronounced on Labour’s antisemitism? Ohh - there’s that hypocrite thing again!
Churchill was a great leader and a man who rallied his nation, and indeed the entire free world for some time, in opposing and ultimately helping bring about the destruction of what was probably the most evil regime in human history.
You personally have it seems worked and prospered within the freedoms and opportunities offered to you by living as in essence a guest in the UK and yet daily slag it off. You have little positive to say about anything to do with it and in fact clearly hold the place in abject contempt.
After a lengthy spell trying to find a middle way with you I’ve ultimately given up. Finding myself in full agreement with Max and Milti.
You Sir are a self opinionated prat. Moreover, you are certainly the most morose cunt I’ve ever had the displeasure to come across in my many years of multiple-forum experience.
I earnestly believe you would be much happier if you fucked off to somewhere that would be more fitting to your interminably sour personality. From the shite you regularly pour out perhaps Putin’s Nirvana would suit? You are certainly excellently qualified for a job with the I.R.A in St Petersburgh.
“Toxic” is an understatement.
You what? Was not aware ECHR was involved in that little episode. I gave a chance to partake in a discussion so you can learn exactly who did what and how much anti-Semitism Labour Party had and you of course know it all and did not bother.
First of all find out who did do the investigation (Which you were right when you said the only other party investigated was the fascist party.
Secondly the difference between the two investigations which was it was at the request of the Labout party.
Thirdly find out how many things they found wrong?
An last who was responsible for it.
That is your homework for the rest of day. I want all your findings posted today.
Of course there is also the possibility that you will find nothing as you have no idea what ECHR role is and when do they get involved and why too.
Today I am in need of a bit a laugh as I have too much work to do so it breaks the monotony as it were.
As to Churchill, he was a disaster in 1960 in the Dardanelles and cause death of 110,000 soldiers from UK, Australia and New Zealand. He also killed 210,000 British soldiers in the first landing in Europe and of course not forgetting the 3 million Indians he starved to death as he took all their grain so the Europeans can have it and burnt their boats so Japs could not make any use of them if India fell but it meant that they could not bring any food in either.
And finally if Stalin did not take out 145 divisions of the German Army we would all be speaking German now. There were 40 division of soldiers in the west fighting Brits and Yanks.
This idea that Churchill won the war is the worst false storey dished out to this day. He was a crap politician and war monger and a racist as he wrote "The Indians smell".
