Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-25/malaysia-jet-traced-with-physics-in-pizza-fueled-inmarsat-huddle.html

quote:

The Inmarsat teams, meeting in the glass-coated company headquarters that borders London’s financial district, also used Boeing data on aircraft performance to see where the Doppler effect would result in a pattern that matched the data from Flight 370, McLaughlin said. Boeing declined to comment.

The team’s "eureka moment" came over the weekend, McLaughlin said. To validate its approach, the team shared its findings with engineers familiar with satellites as a form of scientific peer review. He declined to identify the company.

Here is the full story rather than just pasting part of it!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-2 ... uddle.html

Boeing does not have to make any comment and they would be ill advised to do so at this point. Boeing provided the performance data, and still I do not here any objections coming from Boeing.

What is it you want them to say?

Are you giving me my own links back? You think I haven't read it? The fact is the reporter tried to be as detailed as possible.

Now you tell me if this part says they gave the data to Being and boeing agreed.

he Inmarsat teams, meeting in the glass-coated company headquarters that borders London’s financial district, also used Boeing data on aircraft performance to see where the Doppler effect would result in a pattern that matched the data from Flight 370, McLaughlin said.

Boeing have the data I can assure you!

Inmarsat are contracted by Boeing Corporation to provide services which means Boeing is probably their most valuable client. They do not need to make any further comment nor would they place themselves in such a vulnerable position.

[Paphitis]

As to the Chinese, there contribution with 1960s technology is valued. They are doing quite well when compared to 21st Century Orions and Poseidons!

[Pyrpolizer]

And here;s an article from a more influencial newspaper THE TIMES

http://time.com/36496/china-demands-mal ... -on-plane/

China Demands Malaysia Turn Over Satellite Data

AP / Eileen Ng and Scott McDonald.

[Pyrpolizer]

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-25/malaysia-jet-traced-with-physics-in-pizza-fueled-inmarsat-huddle.html

quote:

The Inmarsat teams, meeting in the glass-coated company headquarters that borders London’s financial district, also used Boeing data on aircraft performance to see where the Doppler effect would result in a pattern that matched the data from Flight 370, McLaughlin said. Boeing declined to comment.

The team’s "eureka moment" came over the weekend, McLaughlin said. To validate its approach, the team shared its findings with engineers familiar with satellites as a form of scientific peer review. He declined to identify the company.

Here is the full story rather than just pasting part of it!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-2 ... uddle.html

Boeing does not have to make any comment and they would be ill advised to do so at this point. Boeing provided the performance data, and still I do not here any objections coming from Boeing.

What is it you want them to say?

Are you giving me my own links back? You think I haven't read it? The fact is the reporter tried to be as detailed as possible.

Now you tell me if this part says they gave the data to Being and boeing agreed.

he Inmarsat teams, meeting in the glass-coated company headquarters that borders London’s financial district, also used Boeing data on aircraft performance to see where the Doppler effect would result in a pattern that matched the data from Flight 370, McLaughlin said.

Boeing have the data I can assure you!

Inmarsat are contracted by Boeing Corporation to provide services which means Boeing is probably their most valuable client. They do not need to make any further comment nor would they place themselves in such a vulnerable position.

Oh yes you can assure me.

The only thing you cannot understand- and I don't really blame you for that- is that they asked Boeing to give them the frequency and other characteristics of the transmitter. And Boeing gave it to them. They did not ask neither checked not verified their data, or their methods or anything.

And do go read what Inmarsat does. Pinging up a few aeroplanes Engines data here and there is a miniscule part of their activities. Boeing is their most valuable client you are just seeing thing LOL

[Pyrpolizer]

Furthermore I consider the role of the Chinese in this case as crucial. Because they are the only ones who can confirm or reject the whole story be it the conditions under which the plane crashed, and the data that was presumably used to locate it.
Whatever the Australian- British -Americans trio may finally announce will still be questionable because they all 3 are one and the same.
The only ones who can confirm it are the Chinese.

[Paphitis]

And here;s an article from a more influencial newspaper THE TIMES

http://time.com/36496/china-demands-mal ... -on-plane/

China Demands Malaysia Turn Over Satellite Data

AP / Eileen Ng and Scott McDonald.

Only in your dreams mate! Videos even depict the Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister of Chine meeting with Malaysian prime Minister and it appeared very cordial and respectful!

The Malaysians are easily offended culturally, so there is no way the Chinese would have DEMANDED. They asked, but that does not stop people like you or the Times coming up with total crap because it sells more papers.

So what is your agenda? To drive a rift between the Chinese on one hand and the Australians and Malaysians on the other? It's not gonna happen mate!

[Paphitis]

Oh yes you can assure me.

The only thing you cannot understand- and I don't really blame you for that- is that they asked Boeing to give them the frequency and other characteristics of the transmitter. And Boeing gave it to them. They did not ask neither checked not verified their data, or their methods or anything.

And do go read what Inmarsat does. Pinging up a few aeroplanes Engines data here and there is a miniscule part of their activities. Boeing is their most valuable client you are just seeing thing LOL

It's not Boeing's core business to analyse that kind of data. They contract Inmarsat for that stuff.

The only thing required of Boeing is to provide the performance data, which they did, and at the same time I don't here Boeing Corporation objecting or protesting against the Inmarsat findings.

[Pyrpolizer]

And here;s an article from a more influencial newspaper THE TIMES

http://time.com/36496/china-demands-mal ... -on-plane/

China Demands Malaysia Turn Over Satellite Data

AP / Eileen Ng and Scott McDonald.

Only in your dreams mate! Videos even depict the Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister of Chine meeting with Malaysian prime Minister and it appeared very cordial and respectful!

The Malaysians are easily offended culturally, so there is no way the Chinese would have DEMANDED. They asked, but that does not stop people like you or the Times coming up with total crap because it sells more papers.

So what is your agenda? To drive a rift between the Chinese on one hand and the Australians and Malaysians on the other? It's not gonna happen mate!

Are you going to discredit THE TIMES now?

[Pyrpolizer]

Oh yes you can assure me.

The only thing you cannot understand- and I don't really blame you for that- is that they asked Boeing to give them the frequency and other characteristics of the transmitter. And Boeing gave it to them. They did not ask neither checked not verified their data, or their methods or anything.

And do go read what Inmarsat does. Pinging up a few aeroplanes Engines data here and there is a miniscule part of their activities. Boeing is their most valuable client you are just seeing thing LOL

It's not Boeing's core business to analyse that kind of data. They contract Inmarsat for that stuff.

The only thing required of Boeing is to provide the performance data, which they did, and at the same time I don't here Boeing Corporation objecting or protesting against the Inmarsat findings.

You are the one who said they gave them to Beoeing and Boeing agreed. Not me.
In fact if I remember well you said they gave them to Airbus and Airbus agreed too

[Paphitis]

Furthermore I consider the role of the Chinese in this case as crucial. Because they are the only ones who can confirm or reject the whole story be it the conditions under which the plane crashed, and the data that was presumably used to locate it.
Whatever the Australian- British -Americans trio may finally announce will still be questionable because they all 3 are one and the same.
The only ones who can confirm it are the Chinese.

The Chinese have always been an integral part of the search effort and as such they are a partners with Australia, Malaysia, US, NZ< Canada, UK, Japan and France.

They have participated in the joint operations without any issue. The operations are Australian led, and that is as a result of fundamental International Maritime Law. therefore, the Chinese, along with the US and UK have to abide Australia's SAR jurisdiction in the area and no one seems to have any issue with that, including the Chinese!